This basic policy change undermines Amnesty’s longstanding moral credibility and unnecessarily diverts its mission. In promoting abortion, Amnesty divides its own members (many of whom are Catholics and others who defend the rights of unborn children) and jeopardizes its support by people in many nations, cultures and religions who share a consistent commitment to all human rights.He ends his statement by calling AI "to act in accord with its noblest principles, reconsider its error, and reverse its policy on abortion."
I am glad to see the bishops continue to engage Amnesty International with hope that its leaders will reconsider and reverse its policy on abortion. I believe our best hope in ending abortion (as much as humanly possible) lies in conversing with those we are inclined to label enemies. The legislative and judicial battles pertaining to abortion will continue to be fought until the hearts and minds on all sides are open, with each side understanding the others as they understand themselves. The temptation on all sides right now is to demonize the other and present its side as the only one with real moral concerns.
I have little doubt that the movers and shakers in the abortion rights movement are preparing for the aftermath of Roe v. Wade's being overturned. Such an event will mean little until there is effectively no abortion rights movement. That will come when there is no perceived need for one. If we want a world without abortion, then we need to be talking humbly, charitably, and respectfully with those who see abortion as a right. And we need to listen. Otherwise, they will not listen to us.